HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 19741 of 1989 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE DONADI RAMESH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioners were appointed pursuant to the selection process as C.T. Grade teachers on ad-hoc basis. Subsequently, on 20.04.1988, the said appointment papers were sent to the District Inspector of Schools, Meerut and consequently, the petitioners joined and discharged their duties by imparting education to the students. In view of subsequent changes of the policy, the respondents have rejected the appointments of the petitioners vide order dated 28.06.1989. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 3 Considering the submissions, this Court passed the following interim orders on 26.10.1989: "In the meantime, the petitioners shall continue to work as ad-hoc teachers in C.T. grade and paid their salary until new incumbents are appointed after due selection by the Board." 4. By virtue of the above said interim order, the petitioners have continued and salaries were paid regularly. In due course on 31.03.2018, the first petitioner has retired on attaining the age of superannuation and second petitioner died in the year 2011 and third petitioner retired on 31.03.2018. 5. Undisputedly, the petitioners have continued by virtue of the interim order granted by this Court and salaries have also been released by the authorities as directed by this Court. In view of the said circumstances, the petitioners are entitled for regularization of their services as per section 33A - C of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kaushik, Kamlesh Shukla, Prashant Shukla, Siddharth Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : S.C. Laxman Sharma And Other .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And Other .....Respondent(s) Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education (Services Selection Boards) Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1982"). 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has made his submissions that as the State Government has already considered and incorporated the provisions for regularization of services of identical teachers, the respondents may be directed to consider the case of the petitioners under the above said provisions and pass appropriate orders, accordingly. 7. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents has not disputed the above facts. 8. Considering the submissions and on perusal of the records, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners under Section 33A - C of the Act, 1982 and pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 9. It is needless to mention that once the orders are passed, the respondents shall release all consequential benefits to the petitioners. October 9, 2025 rkg WRIA No. 19741 of 1989 2 (Donadi Ramesh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad