CR-3309-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (121) CR-3309-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: - 29.05.2025 M/s Om Shanti Steel Works and others ....Petitioners Versus Yogesh Kumar Bansal .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Abhinav Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the respondent-caveator. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 11.03.2024 passed by the Rent Controller, Panipat, vide which the petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 has been allowed. Challenge is also to the judgment dated 14.05.2025 vide which the appeal filed by the petitioners has been dismissed by the Appellate Authority. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, on instructions from his client, has submitted that the petitioners be NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-3309-2025 (O&M) -2- permitted to withdraw the present revision petition but has sought time to vacate the premises and to shift to another premises. It has been stated that the petitioners are tenant in the premises for the last more than five years. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with the following observations/directions:- (i) The petitioners would be permitted to occupy the premises till 31.01.2026, subject to the conditions mentioned hereinafter and would vacate the premises and hand over the keys of the premises to the respondent on or before 31.01.2026. (ii) The petitioners would pay an amount of Rs.15,000/- per month from the month of June, 2025 up to the period the petitioners stays in occupation, on or before 10th of every month. (iii) The petitioners would pay the arrears of rent, if any, within a period of two months from today. (iv) The petitioners would file an undertaking on the said three aspects before the Executing Court within a period of three weeks from today with an advance copy to counsel for the landlord in the Executing Court. 4. It is made clear that in case the petitioners do not submit the said undertaking or do not comply with any of the abovesaid conditions then it would be open to the landlord to seek immediate possession of the NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-3309-2025 (O&M) -3- premises in question from the petitioners by applying for police help in addition to taking recourse to other proceedings including the Contempt of Courts Act. 5. In view of what has been observed above, the present revision petition is disposed of. ( VIKAS BAHL ) May 29, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement