RAVI KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/15997/2025 · 2025-05-28
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64372 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64372 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 161 CWP-15997-2025
Date of decision: 28.05.2025
Ravi Kumar and others
...Petitioners
Versus State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
***** Present : Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. (through hybrid mode) ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioners though senior to the private respondent Nos. 4 to 8 as per seniority list, Annexure P-2, have still not been promoted to the post of Junior Assistant, with regard to which a legal notice dated 07.04.2025, Annexure P-7, has been served upon respondent No.2, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection.
2.
In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice dated 07.04.2025, Annexure P-7, expeditiously, in accordance with law.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 28.05.2025 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned
: Yes / No Whether reportable
: Yes / No HAMANT 2025.05.28 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document