Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6437 (BOM)

VIJAY SURYABHAN LAGAD v. VIMAL MOHAN MANMODE AND OTHERS

CA/654/2025 · 2025-01-20

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 40ca654.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 40 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 654 OF 2025 IN SA/188/2023 VIJAY SURYABHAN LAGAD VERSUS VIMAL MOHAN MANMODE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Temak Rahul B. Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1,2A to 2E in SA : Mr. C.V. Subhedar h/f Mr. C.V.Dharurkar ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 20.01.2025 PER COURT :- 1. By this application the applicant seeks to bring on record respondent No. 2-F, as one of the legal representative of deceased respondent No. 2. There is delay of 1168 days in filing the application. 2. It is a matter of record that after the death of original respondent No. 2 already 2-A to 2-E, legal representatives are brought on record in view of order dated 16.02.2023 passed in 2 40ca654.25 Civil Application No. 12032 of 2022. It appears that one of the legal representative i.e. respondent No. 2-F was remained to be taken on record. It is also submitted that the parties are already before the Mediator and the matter is at the verge of settlement. 3. In that view of the same, there is no impediment in allowing the application. 4. The application is allowed in terms of prayer Clauses (B) and (C). 5. Amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE mahajansb/