5i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY ^ \< TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3377 OF 2025 Between: Morriboina Rangaiah, S/o. Late Balayya, Aged 64 years, Occ; Retired Ex- Serviceman, R/o. D.No.4-260, Rajaji Street, Markapur, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur Revenue Division, Prakasam District. 4. Tahsildar, Peddaraveedu Mandal Prakasam District. 5. Village Revenue Officer, Obulankapalli Village, Peddaraveedu Mandal Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents particularly 4th respondent in unilaterally deleting the petitioner Online Web Land Revenue Records such as Adangal/Pahani and l-B Register connected to his landed property of Ac. 1.00 cents in Survey Number 37/4A of Obulakkapalle Revenue Village in Peddaraveedu Mandal of Prakasam District, without notice and without following any known name in procedure established by law, as illegal, irregular, irrational, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to restore my name in web land record of rights forthwith, without interfering in any manner with his peaceful possession and enjoyment over my said land. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with petitioner possession over his land of Ac. 1.00 cents in Survey Number 37/4A of Obulakkapalle Revenue Village in Peddaraveedu Mandal of Prakasam District, by suspending the operation of illegal mutation entries in web land record of rights connected to his said land, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: SRI K. ARJUN CHOWDARY, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010060172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3377/2025 Between: 1.MORR1BOINA RANGAIAH,, S/0. LATE BALAYYA, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC RETIRED EX-SERVICEMAN, STREET, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, R/0. D.NO.4-260, RAJAJI ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MARKAPUR REVENUE DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4.TAHSILDAR, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5.VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, OBULANKAPALLI VILLAGE, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent{S): 2 1.GPF0R REVENUE The Court made the following ORAL ORDER; Heard Smt. Nimmagadda Revathi, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Arjun Chowdary, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue. 2. The grievance of the Writ Petitioner is that the Tahsildar, Peddaraveedu Mandal (Ftespondent No.4) has unilaterally deleted the of the Writ Petitioner in the online web land Revenue record such as Adangal /Pahani and 1B Register and further insisting the Writ Petitioner to vacate from the subject land to an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Survey No.37/4A of Obulakkapalle revenue village. % name Learned Asst. Government Pleader has submitted the Written Instructions dated 10.02.2025 furnished by the Tahsildar. Peddaraveedu. Copy of it has been served on the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. 4. Serial No. 15 of the Written Instructions is usefully extracted hereunder: 15 Written Instructions (brief facts) (2 to 3 lines) (A) Regarding oraver of the petitioner to not to disposes: It is submitted that the respondents have never forced the petitioner to vacate the occupations made by the petitioner in the subject land in Sy.No.37/4 of Obulakkapalli village. (B) Regarding suspension of operation of ilieoai mutation entries: - It is submitted that Resurvey of the lands in Obulakkapalli Village was done recently and new survey & land records were brought assigned with new land parcel number. The land covered by S.No.37/4 was assigned with L.P.No.181 and classification of the land was recorded as Vagu Poramboke. 3 It is submitted that further enquiry a reasoned order in respect of deleting the name of the petitioner in present web land will be issued after following due procedure and verification of survey records. 5. The above extract would indicate that the Respondents have never forced the Writ Petitioner to vacate from the subject land. It is also stated that a reasoned order will be passed after further enquiry and by following the due process of law and verification of the survey records. 6. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition at the admission stage without going into merit in terms of the above Written Instructions. In view of the fact that the name of the Writ Petitioner has been removed unilaterally, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Respondent Authorities to complete the enquiry and issue Speaking Order in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from today. 7. Till the final Speaking Orders are passed, the Official Respondents are directed to maintain Status quo obtaining as on today as regards the possession of the Writ Petitioner. 8. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 9. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur Revenue Division, Prakasam District. 4. The Tahsildar, Peddaraveedu Mandal Prakasam District. 5. The Village Revenue Officer, Obulankapalli Village, Peddaraveedu Mandal Prakasam District. 6. One CC to M/s. Nimmagadda Revathi, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies. ssb T. HIGH COURT DATED:17/02/2025 ORDER X 2 'I FEB 2025 ^ . Current ieciion WP.No.3377 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS