PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/17659/2025 · 2025-08-06
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134155 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17659 of 2025 Petitioner :- Priyanka And Another Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neha Rani,Satyvendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has handed over a copy of the instructions, the same is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
3. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought.
4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions so received, stated that both the petitioners are leading their peaceful married life at some other State.
5. In view of the above, no cause of action survives for pressing the instant petition preferred at the behest of the petitioners, since the police protection cannot be provided apart from territorial jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh and as such, the petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad