HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2024/2025 Mahendra Singh S/o Shir Raghunath Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dhaneshawar, Police Station Bholi Dist. Sawai Madhopur. Currently Residing Mahboob Ki Chakki Ke Pass, Bajrang Colony Gandhi Nagar, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 13/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.400/2024 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer, for the offence(s) under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner borrowed Rs.10 lakhs from the complainant and issued a cheque and the said cheque was dishonoured. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2024/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and he knowingly issued the cheque in favour of the complainant, despite knowing the fact that the bank has already been merged with the other bank and the cheque would get dishonoured. It is also contended that the cheque was issued in favour of the complainant with dishonour intention, therefore, considering the above facts, the bail application of the accused- petitioner deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court. Though, there are criminal record against the present accused petitioner, but considering the period of incarceration suffered by the accused petitioner, and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mahendra Singh S/o Shir Raghunath Singh in connection with FIR No.400/2024 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2024/2025] 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -310