IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51785 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2024 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Karan Sah, Son of Late Hira Sah, R/O Mohalla/Vill.- Paiganmerpur, P.S.- Keoti, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kedar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 407 of 2024 for the offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2), 74, 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per prosecution, the petitioner along with other accused persons assaulted the informant by means of farsa, lathi and danda due to which the informant received injury on his head. It is also alleged that co-accused Kallu Sah took Rs. 2700/- from the pocket of the informant and when the daughter- in-law and wife of the informant came to save him they were also assaulted and co-accused Sunil Sah outraged their modesty. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51785 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to old enmity. There is house dispute between the parties. The doctor found only lacerated wound on the left frontal head with skin deep. The nature of injury was simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. After completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025 having one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial of the case. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions on behalf of the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in Keoti P.S. Case No. 407 of 2024. khushbu/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T