NILU BHUSON DEY AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
WP(C)/634/2025 · 2025-02-12
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6435 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6435 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010016532025
2025:GAU-AS:1467
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/634/2025 NILU BHUSON DEY AND ANR S/O LATE OMULYA KUMAR DEY, R/O WARD NO. 11, KARIMGANJ TOWN, P.O. AND P.S KARIMGANJ, DIST- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM- 788710.
2: NANTU BHUSON DEY S/O LATE OMULYA KUMAR DEY R/O WARD NO. 11 KARIMGANJ TOWN P.O. AND P.S KARIMGANJ DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM- 788710 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRIBHUMI DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788710.
3:THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR SRIBHUMI DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788710 4:THE SUB REGISTRAR SRIBHUMI (SADAR) DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788710 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D HUSSAIN, MR. R A MAZUMDER,MR. R A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 13.02.2025
Heard Mr. R.A. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 1; Mr. N. Goswami, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3.
2. The petitioners have approached this Court by the instant writ petition with a grievance that their application for Sale Permission/No Objection Certificate [NOC] is pending since 31.03.2024.
3. When the writ petition was listed on 10.02.2025, Mr. Goswami, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam was asked to obtain instruction by today as to whether the application has been disposed of or is pending as on date. Today, Mr. Goswami has submitted, on instruction received from the District Commissioner, Sribhumi, that the Sale Permission/NOC in respect of the application filed by the petitioners has been granted.
4. As the Sale Permission/NOC has been granted by the jurisdictional District Commissioner, Sribhumi, there is no surviving cause of action to continue with the writ petition. In such view of the matter, the writ petition stands closed. It is, however, observed that in the event the petitioners are aggrieved in any manner as regards the Sale Permission/NOC, the petitioners will be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant