Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64344 (ALL)

VISHRAM PANDEY v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/18516/2025 · 2025-09-24

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18516 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Devi Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Sri R.K. Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 and 5. 2. The record reflects that in respect of the relief sought the petitioner has already invoked the remedy under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, which is stated to pending consideration. 3. Needless to say once the proceedings are going on before the Arbitrator, the petitioner may press the relief in the on going proceedings and no relief can be granted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 25, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devi Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Devi Prasad Singh, Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal, Vaibhav Tripathi (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Vishram Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad