Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64299 (PAT)

Sidhari Mahto v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./53757/2025 · 2025-08-06

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53757 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2025 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Sidhari Mahto S/O Late Lakhichand Mahto @ Lakhi Chand Mahto R/O Village-Piprahiya(Piparhiya), PS-Isuapur, Distt-Saran at Chapra 2. Praduman Mahto @ Rajesh Paswan S/OLate Krishna Mahto R/O Village- Piprahiya(Piparhiya), PS-Isuapur, Distt-Saran at Chapra 3. Rajesh Manjhi S/O Lalu Manjhi R/O Village-Piprahiya(Piparhiya), PS- Isuapur, Distt-Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025 dated 15.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 110 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners have no concern with the said Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53757 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 vehicle. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 16.06.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran, Chapra in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed. guddukr/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T