IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-15797-2025 Date of Decision: 28.05.2025 PINKI ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Inter alia prayer in the present petition is for directing the respondents to recommend the name of the petitioner to the post of Group D in view of her merit under the ESP (SC) Category. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has secured more marks than the cutoff as prescribed by the respondent- Commission, however, notwithstanding the same, the Commission neither recommended the name of the petitioner for the post of Group D nor have they allowed her to join. The petitioner made several requests to the respondents, but nothing fruitful could be gained. Notice of motion. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and prays for some time to seek instructions. RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.05.28 05:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order CWP-15797-2025 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contends that he would be satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No.3- The Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula is directed to treat the present petition as a representation and to consider and decide the same by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection to the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, in view of the above; with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of while directing respondent No.3 to treat the present writ petition as a representation and to consider and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties within a period of two months of the receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to mention that upon considering the case of the petitioner, if the decision goes in favour of the petitioner, the needful recommendation be also done within a further period of two months. Disposed of in above terms. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MAY 28, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.05.28 05:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order