Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6429 (UTT)

MAHENDRA LAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1366/2025 · 2025-06-03

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/54 WPMS No.1366 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. M.S. Pal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Shivam Singh Pargai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent nos.1 to 5. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought directions to the respondent no.3 to remove liquor shop from Gopalnagar, Maldhan Chaur, Ramnagar, District Nainital and to run and manage his liquor shop at allotted place i.e. at Hathi Dagar, Maldhan Chaur, Ramnagar, District Nainital. Learned State Counsel was required to get instruction in the matter. Today, learned State Counsel would submit that since it was a new shop, now it has been closed. The Court takes on record the statement given by the learned State Counsel. In view of the statement given by the learned State Counsel, nothing survives in the writ petition. It stands disposed of accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 03.06.2025 Sanjay