Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6429 (KAR)

MANJUNATH KRISHNA MOGER v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/104732/2023 · 2025-01-20

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:924 WP No. 104732 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 104732 OF 2023 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: MANJUNATH KRISHNA MOGER, A/A 39 YEARS, CLASS I CONTRACTOR. R/O UMMACHAGI, TAL: YELLAPUR. UTTARA KANNADA, DISTRICT- 581359. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.P. HEGDE JANMANE, AND SRI. VUJAY M. MALALI, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SECRETARY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT. M.S.BULDING, BANGALORE -560001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PANCHAYATRAJ ENGINEERING CIRCLE OFFICE, KILLA BELAGAVI- 590001. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATRAJ ENGINEERING DIVISION, SIRSI, U.K. DISTRICT- 581401. 4. TOLARAMAJI ANANDJI ATTARAWALA, A/A 40 YEARS, CLASS-IV CONTRACTOR, R/O NEAR MARUTI TEMPLE, MUNDGOD ROAD, RAVINDRA NAGAR, YELLAPUR, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT- 581359. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:924 WP No. 104732 of 2023 (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR L. HAVARAGI, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO, I) ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF REJECTING THE TECHNICAL BID FOR THE WORK CONSTRUCTION OF 300 METERS CC ROAD IN KUNADARAGI PANCHAYAT LIMITS OF YELLAPUR TALUK WITH INDENT NO.99756 PRODUCED AS PER (UNDATED ANNEXURE-F) AND ALSO LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE DATED 27-3-2023 (ANNEXURE-J), WORK ORDER DATED 28-3-2023 (ANNEXURE-K) AND TENDER AGREEMENT DATED 28-3-2023 (ANNEXURE-L), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 2. In that light, petition stands disposed having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 155