Page No. 1/3 GAHC010016292025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/484/2025 KAMAL MAHAJAN AND 5 ORS SON OF JYOTISH MAHAJAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAYETHPARA PART-II, P.O.- KAYETHPARA, IN THE DISTRICT OF BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783389. 2: ALIM UDDIN SK SON OF LATE KHASBAR ALI SK RESIDENT OF DHAKNABARI P.O.- BOITHAMARI IN THE DISTRICT OF BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783389. 3: ALA UDDIN SON OF LATE HABIBAR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAYETHPARA PART-I P.O.- KAYETHPARA IN THE DISTRICT OF BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783389. 4: ABDUL JALIL SON OF GOLAP UDDIN SK. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAYETHPARA PART-II P.O.- KAYETHPARA IN THE DISTRICT OF BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783389. 5: ABDUL KALAM SK SON OF LATE KAYETHPARA PART-I P.O.- KAYETHPARA IN THE DISTRICT OF BONGAIGAON ASSAM Page No. 2/3 PIN- 783389. 6: ASHRAFUL ALI SK SON OF LATE AFAJ UDDIN SK RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAYETHPARA PART-II P.O.- KAYETHPARA IN THE DISTRICT OF BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783389 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DOWN TOWN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI- 781037. 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMIATATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BONGAIGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S Ali, MRS. B GOGOI,MS M BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, ASEC,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 05.02.2025 Heard Mr. S. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. K. Konwar, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4; and Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Election Commission for the respondent no. 2. Page No. 3/3 After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at length, Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file a fresh writ petition, in the event of a fresh cause of action. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Therefore, the instant writ petition stands dismissed, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant