DEEPAK KUMAR v. HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL UNIVERSITY SRINAGAR
WPSS/779/2025 · 2025-05-16
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6428 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6428 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 24
WPSS No.779 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Vikas Singh Yadav and Neelam Godiyal, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. (Dr.) Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- I. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to regularize/appoint the petitioner on regular basis against the vacant post which is lying vacant in the university at present. II. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authorities to complete the process of regularization of the petitioner within a prescribed period as this Hon’ble Court deems fit. III. Pass any other writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. IV. Award the cost of the writ petition to the Petitioner. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that similar controversy has already been decided on 20.03.2018, by this Court in WPSS No.425 of 2014, Kumesh Kumar and Others Vs. HNB Garhwal University Srinagar and Others. Learned State Counsel admits this fact.
Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 20.03.2018, by this Court in WPSS No.425 of 2014, Kumesh Kumar and Others Vs. HNB Garhwal University Srinagar and Others.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
16.05.2025 RV