Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64265 (MAD)

Tvl Royal Cashews v. he State Tax Officer Inspection V Office of the Commercial Tax Officer

WP/20439/2025 · 2025-06-09

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.20439 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 09.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.20439 of 2025 & W.M.P.Nos.23053 & 23055 of 2025 Tvl Royal Cashews Rep by its Proprietor Mr. Ukkravelu, No.1113, West Main Road, Visur Post, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu- 607 805 GSTIN 33AETPU4164J1ZV ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer Inspection-v Office Of The Commercial Tax Officer, No.1, Vallalar Nagar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore Tamil Nadu-607 001 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Respondent herein in its Impugned order passed in GSTIN- 33AETPU4164J1ZV/2023-2024 dated 08.11.2024 along with the Consequential order in Form DRC-07 bearing Reference No.ZD331124059297F dated 09.11.2024 for the period April 2023- August 2023, and quash the same For Petitioner : Ms.R. Hemalatha 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20439 of 2025 For Respondent : Mr.C.Harsha Raj, SGP ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 08.11.2024 passed by the respondent. 2. Mr.C.Harsha Raj, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is willing to file an appeal against the said impugned assessment order. Therefore, though he had sought for larger relief in this petition, he had restricted his relief to the extent to request this Court to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal. 4. Further, he would submit that he is willing to pay 25% of the 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20439 of 2025 disputed tax amount, i.e., 10% towards statutory pre-deposit for filign the appeal along with additional pre-deposit of 15%, to the respondent. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5. In reply, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent requests this Court to pass any appropriate orders with regard to the filing of appeal. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record. 7. In the case on hand, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that now the petitioner is willing to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order dated 08.11.2024 passed by the respondent and he has restricted his relief and requested this Court to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order since it will be sufficient to meet out the case of the petitioner. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20439 of 2025 8. Further, it was submitted that the petitioner is now willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax amount to the respondent. Therefore, though this petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 08.11.2024, considering the submissions made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order. 9. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 10. While dismissing this petition, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, subject to the payment of 25% of the disputed tax amount to the respondent (10% of disputed tax amount towards statutory pre-deposit for filing the appeal along with additional 15% of disputed tax amount). In such case, the Appellate Authority shall consider the said appeal filed by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law, by 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20439 of 2025 providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation. 09.06.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No nsa To The State Tax Officer Inspection-v Office Of The Commercial Tax Officer, No.1, Vallalar Nagar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore Tamil Nadu-607 001 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20439 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa W.P.No.20439 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.23053 & 23055 of 2025 09.06.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis