IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20844-2021 Date of decision : April 08, 2025 Neerja Jain ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : None for the petitioner Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab for respondent nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Saksham Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No. 5 KULDEEP TIWARI,J. (ORAL) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position since last two occasions. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no. 5, informed this Court that even the prayer made in the instant petition has been rendered infructuous, as the tenure of the contract qua which the complaint has been made has already expired. It seems that the petitioner did not want to pursue the instant matter. Therefore, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. ( KULDEEP TIWARI ) April 08, 2025 JUDGE 'tiwana' Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2025.04.09 11:10 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh