IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53761 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-587 Year-2025 Thana- RAMNAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Biltu Yadav @ Bittu Kumar Yadav S/o Sudarshan Yadav R/o Village-Semara Bargo, P.S.- Ramnagar,District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prerna Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 587 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per prosecution case, informant is posted on the post of B.C.M in the Bharat Finance Inclusion Limited and while he was doing work on computer system alongwith his associates, two miscreants armed with country made katta entered into the room and they started abusing him. It is further alleged that miscreants demanded key of the locker and rupees on the gunpoint. On protest by the informant, miscreants assaulted him by the butt of katta upon his head due to which he sustained injury on head. It is further alleged that miscreants snatched 18,000/- from the box of table and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53761 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 also snatched Rs. 28,000/- from the pocket of the Tabrej Alam. It is further alleged that, in the meantime, two another miscreants came and snatched mobile phones of the informant and his associates. FIR has been lodged against four unknown persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Uttam Yadav, petitioner’s name has been surfaced in the present case. Except confessional statement of co- accused, there is nothing on record to demonstrate the complicity of petitioner with the alleged occurrence. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 03.04.2025 and he bears criminal antecedent of two cases in which he is on bail. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case just because of having criminal antecedent. Learned counsel orally submits that charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. He further submits that no TIP has been conducted uptill now. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. 5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53761 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Bagaha,West Champaran in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 587 of 2023, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application. (ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. vashudha/- (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) U T