APHC010060312020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3769/2020 Between: 1. A.SANDYA RANI, W/O.A.SIDDAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, MAIN ROAD, DUGGIRALA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP - 522330. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KOTI, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, SBI DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DIST. AP. 3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, RBO, STATE BANK OF INDIA, GANDHI CHOWK, TENALI, GUNTUR DIST. AP. 4. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, DUGGIRALA, GUNTUR DIST. A.P. REP BY ITS MANAGER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the action of the resi)ondent No.4 in issuing the impugned notices dated 01.01.2020 and 14.01.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of the conditions of the lease det d dated 02.08.2017, contrary to law and consequently set-aside the impugned notices dated 01.01.2020 and 14.01.2020 and direct the Re .pondents to continue till the lease period or payment of the lease amount till the end of the lease and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned notices dated 01.01.2020 and 14.01.2020 issued by the 4th Respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SREE RAMULU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Sri N. Krishna Sai, learned counsel representing Sri P.Sree Ramulu Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 24.03.2025 TVN 110 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.3769 OF 2020 Date : 24.03.2025 TVN