HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 19431 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 3. This application under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as BNSS) has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 26.12.2024 as well as cognizance / summoning order dated 06.02.2025, of Case No. 10827 of 2025 (State Vs. Neha Srivastava and others), arising out of Case Crime No.820 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) BNS, P.S.- Chakeri, District- Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of C.J.M., Kanpur Nagar, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant of the case does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. Both the parties are neighbours. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court concerned, has already been verified by the court concerned, copy of which is on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that both the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Raees Ahamad, Rehan Ahamad Neha Srivastava Ans 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant does not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 7. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 8. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 528 BNSS. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. There is nothing to indicate that applicants have any criminal antecedents. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 9. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including charge- sheet & cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case, against applicants, namely, Neha Srivastava, Raman Srivastava, Pawan Srivastava, Aman Srivastava & Smt. Pushpa Devi are hereby quashed. 10. The application u/s 528 BNSS is allowed. September 1, 2025 'SP'/- NA528 No. 19431 of 2025 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad