Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64194 (ALL)

DHARMENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLR/6430/2023 · 2025-07-15

Sameer Jain

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115177 Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6430 of 2023 Revisionist :- Dharmendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sushil Kumar Shukla,Varun Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sukesh Kumar Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Sri Brijesh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sushil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Sukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Kunwar Tejendra Bahadur Singh, learned AGA for the State are present. 2. Present criminal revision has been filed with a prayer to allow this revision and set aise the impugned judgment and order dated 21.10.2023 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Court No.9, Etawah in Criminal Appeal No.44 of 2023 Smt. Pinki and another Versus State of U.P. and others under Section 29 of Prevention of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and impugned ex-parte order dated 22.03.2023 passed by Rural Court Saifai in Complaint Case No.1231 of 2018 Pinki Versus Dharmendra Kumar and others under Section 12 Prevention of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the instant revision has been filed with regard to the dispute arose between revisionist and opposite party no.2 who were husband and wife but now their dispute has been settled, therefore, the instant revision may be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Learned AGA is having no objection to the same. 5. In view of the above, instant revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 S.A. Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad