IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/15978/2025 · 2025-05-28
Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64185 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64185 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-15978-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 117 CWP-15978-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.05.2025. IIFL Home Finance Limited ....Petitioner. VERSUS State of Punjab and others
....Respondents. ***
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA --- Present: Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a financial company and had obtained possession of the mortgaged property in pursuance to order dated 11.09.2024 (Annexure P-3) passed by the District Magistrate, Patiala. However, the private respondents have trespassed in the property and forcibly taken the possession of the secured asset. He also submits that the petitioner has sent complaint/application dated 30.12.2024 (Annexure P-5) in this regard to respondents No.2 to 4 but no action has been taken thereon. He, therefore, submits that respondents No.2 to 4 may be
directed to consider and decide the complaint/application expeditiously.
2. Issue notice to respondents No.1 to 4 only at this stage.
3. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Aftab Singh Khara, Senior DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4.
KUMARI SAPNA 2025.05.28 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement
CWP-15978-2025 (O&M) 2
4. Heard.
5. In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, the petition is
disposed of with direction to respondents No.2 to 4 to consider and decide the complaint/application of the petitioner dated 30.12.2024 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and to restore the possession of the petitioner in accordance with law.
6. It is clarified that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter. This order shall have no bearing on adjudication by the competent Court/Tribunal.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA)
JUDGE 28.05.2025 sapna Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No KUMARI SAPNA 2025.05.28 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement