ANUVARTH PANDIT @ ANUVRIT v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/19349/2025 · 2025-05-27
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64170 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64170 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:91192 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 19349 of 2025 Applicant :- Anuvarth Pandit @ Anuvrit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Tripathi,Faizan Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Indrajeet Singh Yadav, learned AGA for the State/opposite party no.1.
2. Though the application under Section 528 BNSS has been preferred by the applicant for quashing the entire proceedings as well as the summoning order dated 03.01.2022 along with NBW
order dated 18.12.2023 in Complaint Case no.54/IX/2021 (Liyakat Hussain Vs. Anuvarth Pandit Anuvrat), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Banda pending in the court of learned Special Judicial Magistrate first, Banda but the learned counsel for the applicant has confined his relief only for a direction for consideration of the bail application with expedition.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
4. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar and the statements so sought to be made by them, the application stands disposed of while observing that in case appropriate proceeding in the form of bail application is preferred before the court below, then the same shall be decided with most expedition strictly in accordance with the law of the land keeping in view the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2022) 10 SCC 51.
Order Date :- 28.5.2025 piyush Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad