Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64154 (PNJ)

PARDEEP SINGH & ANR. v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

CWP/8924/2011 · 2025-05-27

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 1354 Pardeep Singh and another State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. selection dated 18.03.2011 respondents No.5 to 8 have been appointed, due to the efflux of time, order issued 2. revived by demonstrating that the 27.05.2025 parveen kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision Pardeep Singh and another Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioners. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present selection dated 18.03.2011 qua SC and BC categories, vide which respondents No.5 to 8 have been appointed, due to the efflux of time, especially in wake of there being no interim issued by this Court. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner revived by demonstrating that the lis still subsists Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8924-2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.05.2025 Pardeep Singh and another ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. sent petition for setting aside the qua SC and BC categories, vide which respondents No.5 to 8 have been appointed, might not even be surviving especially in wake of there being no interim Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.27 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.