CWP-15894-2025 (O&M) 144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Yassh Deep Builders LLP State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Ms. Muskan Sharma, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana. SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of remove illegal encroachment, including gates, sheds, walls, and any other obstructive structures erected by respondent No.3 over public road. 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 16.04.2025 (Annexure which has not been adverted 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Yassh Deep Builders LLP versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate Mr. Vipul Sachdeva, Advocate and Ms. Muskan Sharma, Advocate for the Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing respondents remove illegal encroachment, including gates, sheds, walls, and any other obstructive structures erected by respondent No.3 over At the outset, learned counsel for the would be satisfied, in case, his (Annexure P-5) is considered and not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15894-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 09, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Advocate with and for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ respondents No.1 and 2 to forthwith remove illegal encroachment, including gates, sheds, walls, and any other obstructive structures erected by respondent No.3 over the 24-meter wide earned counsel for the petitioner submits that his pending legal notice dated and decided by respondent No.2, by the respondents till date. 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ No.1 and 2 to forthwith remove illegal encroachment, including gates, sheds, walls, and any other meter wide submits that dated , MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.15 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-15894-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on his pending legal notice dated 16.04.2025 (Annexure P-5). 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the pending legal notice dated 16.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE July 09, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.15 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment