Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22034 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1774 of 2025 Petitioner :- Saudan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Rai,Prajyot Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Santosh Kumar Singh,C.S.C.,Harbansh Prasad Pandey,Kaushal Kishore Mani,Rajive Kumar,Rituvendra Singh Nagvanshi,Santosh Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration)- III, Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur in Case No. 372 of 2024 computerized case no. C-202409000000372 (Saudan Singh Vs. Ansh Tomar and others) under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, order dated 21.02.2024 passed by the Deputy Collector, Shamli in case No. 656 of 2024 computerized case No. T-202409720500656 (Saudan Singh Vs. Ansh Tomar and others) under section 207 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006 and the order dated 25.10.2021 passed by the Nayab Tehsildar, Shamli rejecting the restoration application filed by the petitioner being registered RST/02184/2020 computerized case No. T-202009700502184 (Saudan Singh Versus under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as order dated 11.12.2020 passed by Nayab Tahsildar, Shamli in case No. T-201909720501554 (Annexure Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively to the writ petition.)." 3. Order impugned in the writ petition were passed in proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 i.e. mutation proceedings. Since mutation proceedings are summary in nature and only for the fiscal purposes and do not decide the rights of the parties, therefore, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 4. The petitioner may get his rights declared in a competent court in a regular proceedings. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him by filing a suit in accordance with law. 6. It is needless to say that the findings recorded by the mutation court will not be binding in the regular proceedings, if any, initiated by the petitioner. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad