PURUSHOTTAM RAMAJI DEVIKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY., GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPATMENT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
WP/6393/2025 · 2025-11-10
Shri Anil S Kilor, Shri Rajnish R Vyas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64138 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64138 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 920wp6393.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6393 OF 2025 Purushottam Ramaji Devikar Versus State of Maharashtra , through its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. A.R. Ingole, counsel for petitioner.
Mr. P.P. Pendke, AGP for respondent No.1/State.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR and RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ.
DATE : 10/11/2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to communication dated 03/02/2023, by which recovery has been ordered against the petitioner. He has further submitted that he has made detailed representation to respondent No.3 on 16/05/2023, requesting the authorities to consider the grounds raised therein.
3. In that view of the matter, since the representation was submitted on 16/05/2023 and, according to the petitioner, the same has not been decided till date, we direct the respondent No.3 to decide the representation within a period of six weeks from today. rkn
2 920wp6393.2025.odt
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to produce a copy of this order before the concerned authority within a period of one week from today.
5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) rkn