CWP-15872-2025 (O&M) 143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Sanjeev Sharma State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Kunwar Rajan Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for respondent SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of plot of the same size sector or adjoining sector, as the originally allotted plot is non being marked as disputed/ under encroachment and the petitioner’s entitlement to alternative plot is duly covered under the HSVP’s policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Sanjeev Sharma versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Yadvinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunwar Rajan, Advocate for the Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3 – HSVP. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents of the same size, equivalent in status and preferential value in the same sector or adjoining sector, as the originally allotted plot is non ked as disputed/ under encroachment and the petitioner’s to alternative plot is duly covered under the HSVP’s policy dated 2024 (Annexure P-4). 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15872-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 09, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Yadvinder Singh, Advocate for , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana. , Advocate and HSVP. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to allot an alternative quivalent in status and preferential value in the same sector or adjoining sector, as the originally allotted plot is non-possessionable ked as disputed/ under encroachment and the petitioner’s to alternative plot is duly covered under the HSVP’s policy dated 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ allot an alternative quivalent in status and preferential value in the same possessionable ked as disputed/ under encroachment and the petitioner’s to alternative plot is duly covered under the HSVP’s policy dated MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.16 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-15872-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, his pending representation dated 09.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) is considered and decided by respondent No.3, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 appear and oppose issuance of notice of motion. They submit that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.3 and it shall take decision either way, on his pending representation dated 09.05.2025 (Annexure P-3). 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the pending representation dated 09.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE July 09, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.16 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment