CRM-M-20033 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 139 MAHINDRA SUMMIT AGRISCIENCE LTD. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P 1. directions to against accused respondent No.4 (Proclaimed Offender) in compliance of order dated 02.07.2025 Annexure P First Class Bathinda as the police has failed to arrest him and lodge an FIR against him despite Court order and despite representations Annexure P and P-5 dated 20.11.2025. 2. the petitioner 20033-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH MAHINDRA SUMMIT AGRISCIENCE LTD. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the official respondents No.2 against accused respondent No.4 (Proclaimed Offender) in compliance of order dated 02.07.2025 Annexure P-3 passed by First Class Bathinda as the police has failed to arrest him and lodge an FIR against him despite Court order and despite representations Annexure P 5 dated 20.11.2025. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioner(s) has filed the representation (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20033-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 20.04.2026 MAHINDRA SUMMIT AGRISCIENCE LTD. .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. as been filed by the petitioner(s) 2 and 3 to take effective legal action against accused respondent No.4 (Proclaimed Offender) in compliance of 3 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Bathinda as the police has failed to arrest him and lodge an FIR against him despite Court order and despite representations Annexure P The learned counsel representing the petitioner(s) submits that filed the representation (Annexure P-4) dated (O&M) 20.04.2026 .....PETITIONER(S) .....RESPONDENT(S) for and 3 to take effective legal action against accused respondent No.4 (Proclaimed Offender) in compliance of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Bathinda as the police has failed to arrest him and lodge an FIR against him despite Court order and despite representations Annexure P-4 submits that dated VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.04.21 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-20033 20.11.2025 disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within 3. 4. on behalf of State is hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to th representation of the petitioner order within a period of order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner own level. Vinod Whether Whether reportable 20033-2026 (O&M) 2 20.11.2025 before the respondent No.2 disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. Hence service of notice State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to th representation of the petitioner(s) (Annexure P order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner(s), and t own level. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2. The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the respondent No. to decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time. to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears /State. Hence service of notice upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No. shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents and take an independent decision at his :Yes/No : Yes/No . The learned counsel prays for respondent No.2 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is to decide the by passing a speaking from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents ake an independent decision at his VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.04.21 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document