Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6409 (ORI)

JASMINE NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

EXP/51/2025 · 2026-05-13

Registrar Judicial

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK EXP No.51 of 2025 1) Jasmine Nayak ..... Petitioners 2) Nagamani Kambhar Represented by Adv. – Mr. Avijit Patnaik, Mr. S. Mohapatra, A.N. Das, R.K. Pati -versus- 1) State of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties 2) Director General Of Police-cum-I.G. of Prisons and Director, Correction Services ,Cuttack 3) I.G. of Police (Personnel), Odisha Police State Headquarter, Cuttack 4) Chairman, State Selection Board, Odisha Police, Cuttack 5) Superintendent of Police, Rayagada Represented by Adv. – Mr. S.J. Mohanty, A.S.C. CORAM: REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) ORDER 13.05.2026 Order No. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, decree holders and the learned A.S.C. Perused the execution petition case record and disposed of order passed by the Hon’ble Court on 19.05.2023 passed in WP(C) No. 15196 of 2023. Today, learned A.S.C. filed photocopy of order dated 24.04.2026 passed by the Chairman, State Selection Board, Odisha Police, Cuttack which is taken on record. The concluding paragraph of the said order is as follows: “In view of the above facts, the representation of the petitioners namely Jasmine Nayak and Nagamani Kumbhar is hereby rejected being devoid of merit as they do not fulfil the minimum height Page 2 of 2. requirement prescribed for the post of Constable in UR (women) category. Accordingly, the claim for issuance of appointment order cannot be acceded to.” Learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo for withdrawal of the execution petition. In view of the order passed the Chairman, State Selection Board, Odisha Police, Cuttack and prayer of the counsel for the petitioner, this execution petition is hereby dropped as withdrawn. Registrar (Judicial) Lawzima