Rajendra Mahto @ Rajendra Prasad v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./52709/2025 · 2025-09-02
Satyavrat Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64074 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64074 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52709 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2025 Thana- ALIPUR District- Gaya ======================================================
1. Rajendra Mahto @ Rajendra Prasad S/o Late Ramkishun Mahto R/O Village-Kespa, PS-Alipur, Distt-Gaya
2. Hemanti Devi W/O Rajendra Mahto @ Rajendra Prasad R/O Village-Kespa, PS-Alipur, Distt-Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 02-09-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are husband and wife and petitioner no.1 is aged about 70 years and petitioner no.2 is aged about 67 years and the informant alleges that accused persons came and Manish @ Ajeet assaulted Chintu by khanti causing injury on head, further Rajendra
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52709 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/3 assaulted him by fasuli causing injury on head and also assaulted his mother by fasuli causing injury on hand, thereafter Sanjeev, Randhir and petitioner no.2 with khanti, rod and lathi assaulted him, his father, mother and Chintu causing injury on head and finger of his father, thereafter petitioner no.2 snatched chain of his mother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that Anshu Kumari, daughter- in-law of the petitioners had instituted Alipur P.S. Case No.57/2025 against Pankaj, Shrawan and Chintu alleging that they acted inappropriately with her on account of which an altercation had taken place. It is submitted that as far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, the allegation against her is general and omnibus in nature, through petitioner no.1 is alleged to have assaulted Chintu and mother of the informant by fasuli but Chintu is alleged to have assaulted by khanti by Manish @ Ajeet also and he has suffered one injury on head. It is submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in the instant case only with a view to coerce Anshu Kumari into submission.
It is also submitted that petitioners all through out their life have remained persons with clean antecedent and all of a sudden have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52709 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 3/3 been made a criminal. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Alipur P.S. Case No.55/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T