DEVAVVA D/O. MARIYAVVA HARIJANNA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/107726/2025 · 2025-12-08
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64063 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64063 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17469 WP No. 107726 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 107726 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
DEVAVVA D/O. MARIYAVVA HARIJANNA, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. AT POST: KUKANAPALLI, TQ: KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL-583233. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOVINDAGOUDA D. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TQ: DIST: KOPPAL-583231.
2.
THE THASILDAR KOPPAL TQ: DIST: KOPPAL-583231.
3.
REVENUE INSPECTOR IRKALGADA TQ: DIST: KOPPAL-583237. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R1-R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION VIDE ANNEXURE-G DATED 16-07-2013 AND VIDE ANNEXURE-H DATED 08-08-2018 INSERT PETITIONER NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE COLUMN NUMBER 9 OF THE RTC LAND PERTAINING TO THE LAND BEARING SY NO.57 WHICH IS SITUATED IN KUKANAPALLI VILLAGE KOPPAL TALUK DISTRICT KOPPAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location:
HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17469 WP No. 107726 of 2025
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR REPORTING COMPLIANCE, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the petitioner’s name has been entered in the property records.
2. Under these circumstances, no further order is required to be passed in this petition. However, if the Tahsildar’s appeal is pending before the Assistant Commissioner, same shall be considered in accordance with law.
3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
4. The Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s title.
5. All contentions of the respondents/State are kept open. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE PMP CT-MCK/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 93