SIDDHANT v. CHANCELLER CHANDRASEKHAR AZAD UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/18211/2025 · 2025-07-07
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18211 of 2025 Petitioner :- Siddhant Respondent :- Chanceller Chandrasekhar Azad University Of Agriculture And Technology And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shambhavi Tiwari,Yogesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Rakesh Kumar Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 to conduct Challenge Evaulation of petitioner's answer book of midterm of the subject
"AES-121:FUNDAMENTALS
OF
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS" as per the Notification dated 26.11.2020 issued by Chancellor's Secretariat. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus upon the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 to declare the result of the petitioner on the basis of the marks awarded after challenge evaluation of midterm
answer
book
of
the
subject "AES- 121:FUNDAMENTALS OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS".
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no. 4 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard Sri Shambhavi Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer of the petitioner as no objection made by
learned Standing Counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner is
directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no. 4 within a week. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 4 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.7.2025 SY (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad