W.P.Crl.No. 29 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.Crl.No.29 of 2025 Senthamarai ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Circle, Dr.Radha Krishnan Road, Chennai -4. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chennai Railway District, Egmore, Chennai -84. 3. The Inspector of Police, Railway Police Station, Tambaram, Chennai -45. 4. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai. 5. Asokan 6. Radhi ... Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No. 29 of 2025 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.5.2025 by transferring the case in Crime No.220 of 2025 on the file of the third respondent police station to 4th respondent police station. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash For R1 to R4 : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.5.2025 by transferring the case in Crime No.220 of 2025 on the file of the third respondent police station to 4th respondent police station. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent- Police and perused the materials available on record. 3. Based on the complaint given by one Srinivasan, a case was https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No. 29 of 2025 registered by the third respondent Police in Crime No.220 of 2025 on 24.04.2025. The petitioner made a representation dated 12.5.2025 seeking to transfer the case in Crime No.220 of 2025 on the file of the third respondent police station to 4th respondent police station. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-Police that investigation is pending. On a perusal of the records, it is seen that no grounds are made out by the petitioner for transferring the investigation from the third respondent police station to fourth respondent police station. This Court is not inclined to grant the relief as sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition. 4. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 12.06.2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No. 29 of 2025 To 1. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Circle, Dr.Radha Krishnan Road, Chennai -4. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chennai Railway District, Egmore, Chennai -84. 3. The Inspector of Police, Railway Police Station, Tambaram, Chennai -45. 4. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai. 5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No. 29 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN, J mfa W.P.Crl.No.29 of 2025 12.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis