Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64018 (ALL)

ALOK MANI TRIPATHI v. JYOTI MISHRA

A227/5592/2025 · 2025-07-02

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103012 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5592 of 2025 Petitioner :- Alok Mani Tripathi Respondent :- Jyoti Mishra Counsel for Petitioner :- Nilay Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Sant Kabir Nagar in Case No. 25 of 2023 (Jyoti Mishra Vs. Alok Mani Tripathi) (annexure no. 1 to this petition)." 3. By the order impugned, the application of the petitioner, who is opposite party in the aforesaid proceedings, for summoning the call record of mobile phone of the opposite party as well as location, has been rejected on the ground that evidence of the plaintiff is completed and two defendant witnesses have also been examined. 4. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid evidence is very important for the decision of the dispute. 5. In my view, no illegality has been committed by the court below in rejecting the application of the petitioner. 6. Writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad