IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1320 of 2024 ------ 1. Munna Yadav, aged about 34 years, son of Nandkishor Yadav @ Nand Kishore Yadav 2. Kamaldev Yadav @ Kamaldeo Yadav, aged about 45 years, son of Lattu Yadav 3. Nandlal Yadav, aged about 51 years, son of Ganga Yadav 4. Kailu Yadav, aged about 39 years, son of Ganauri Yadav 5. Dipak Yadav @ Dipak Kumar, aged about 19 years, son of Ganauri Yadav 6. Brijbihari Yadav @ Bihari Yadav, aged about 39 years, son of Basudev Yadav 7. Harendra Yadav @ Harendra Kumar, aged about 23 years son of Jhkasu Yadav 8. Pintu Yadav, aged about 29 years, son of Bigan Yadav 9. Doman Yadav, aged about 54 years, son of Late Chanari Yadav 10. Chalitar Yadav @ Chahitar Yadav aged about 57 years, son of Soharai Yadav @ Mahesh Yadav @ Sohrai Yadav @ Mahesh Yadav 11. Suresh Yadav, aged about 54 years, son of Jageshwar Yadav 12. Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Yadav, aged 27 years, son of Doman Yadav 13. Boudha Yadav @ Boudh Yadav, aged about 37 years, son of Jagu Yadav 14. Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Yadav, aged about 26 years, son of Bhola Yadav 15. Pravesh Yadav @ Ram Pravesh Yadav, aged about 22 years son of Kailu Yadav 16. Babu Yadav @ Devnandan Yadav, aged about 23 years, son of Badu Yadav @ Kailu Yadav 17. Subedar Yadav, aged about 44 years, son of Kailu Yadav 18. Ramswarup Yadav @ Ramswarup Kumar Yadav, aged about 27 years, son of Jhotan Yadav 19. Akhilesh Yadav @ Akhilesh Kumar @ Chhotu, aged about 22 years, son of Dadhu Yadav 20. Nandu Yadav, aged about 30 years, son of Vilash Yadav 21. Jugesh Bhuiyan @ Yugesh Bhuiyan, aged about 36 years, son of Devki Bhuiyan All residents of village Jabra, P.O. & P.S.-Hunterganj, Dist.- Chatra, State-Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Ms. Anshu Kumari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.07 Dated- 06-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No.246 of 2022 instituted under Sections 272, 273, 284, 290, 414, 420, 465 and 34 of the I.P.C and Section 47(a) of the Excise Act, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in illegal business of country made mahuwa liquor. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are false. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.75,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Chatra in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No.246 of 2022 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/