Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64000 (ALL)

SMT. RAMAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIA/7930/2025 · 2025-07-07

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:108517 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7930 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Raman Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities particularly the respondent authorities particularly the respondent no. 3 to transfer the petitioner from Inter Mediate College, Sarurpur, Khedki, District- Baghpat to J.J. Inter College, Sultanpur-Chiklana, District- Saharanpur in pursuance of application dated 23.02.2025 moved by the petitioner. ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authority no. 3 to pass speaking and reasoned order on the application dated 23.02.2025 filed by the petitioner claiming his transfer from Inter Mediate College, Sarurpur, Khedki, District-Baghpat, to J.J. Inter College, Sultanpur-Chiklana, District-Saharanpur within stipulated and reasonable period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no. 5 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Shri Raj Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer of the petitioner as no objection made by learned Standing Counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no. 5 within ten days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 5 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 SY (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad