CWP-17520-2022 (O&M). -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 241 CWP-17520-2022 (O&M). Date of Decision: 07.08.2025. NEERAJ YADAV ... Petitioner(s) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. J.S. Sohal, Advocate, for Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 7. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present writ petition is for directing the respondents to look into and decide the controversy regarding the promotion of OT Technician as detailed in representation dated 23.05.2022 (Annexure P-7). 2 Notice of motion in the present case had been issued vide order dated 18.11.2022. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.11 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17520-2022 (O&M). -2- 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) contends that the petitioner(s) would be satisfied, at this juncture, in case respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as espoused in the present writ petition by passing a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner. 4 Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 7 has no objection to the above request. 5 Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-Director General, ESIC, Panchdeep Bhawan, CIG Marg, New Delhi to decide the claim espoused by the petitioner(s) in the present writ petition by treating the same as a representation and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. August 07, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.11 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document