CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE SIDE 15.12.2025 Court No.01 rpan/22 CRM (A) 815 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure); And In Re: Nur Jamal Miya & Another - Petitioners. Mr. Sudip Guha ...for the Petitioners. Mr. Sourav Ganguly ...for the State. Apprehending arrest in connection with Sitai Police Station Case no.168 of 2025 dated 18.07.2025 under Sections 329(4)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and read with Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act, the present application has been preferred. Mr. Guha, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that on the rudiments of a suo motu complaint lodged by the police authorities, the petitioners have been falsely implicated. Their names also did not feature in the FIR. In the said conspectus, custodial interrogation may not be necessary. Mr. Ganguly, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the petitioners’ prayer and drawing my attention to several documents in the case diary, including the statement made under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Mr. Ganguly submits that there are strong incriminating materials on record against the petitioners and investigation is yet to be completed. 2 Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considering the statement of the witnesses, the injury report, the nature of allegations and the role attributed to the petitioners, I am not inclined to exercise discretion in their favour, moreso when, investigation is still continuing. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 815 of 2025, is dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)