Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010015452025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/340/2025 THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REP BY THE SECRETARY TO THEGOVT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI 2: THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-11 3: CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR PIN-784001 ASSAM TO BE SERVED THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-11 4: DR. JYOTI HAZARIKA MD (MICROBIOLOGY ) LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH QTR NO-E5/TYPE VI LGBRIMH CAMPUS TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR PIN-784001 ASSA VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 DR KANGKAN PATHAK THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate for the Petitioner : MR AJIT KUMAR DUTTA, MR. A K DUTTA (CGC) Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R MAZUMDAR, Linked Case : WP(C)/5561/2024 DR. KANGKAN PATHAK S/O- LATE BISWAMBHAR PATHAK PRESENTLY PROFESSOR AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT PSYCHIATRY LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR PIN-784001 ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-11 2:THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-11 3:CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR Page No.# 3/3 DIST- SONITPUR PIN-784001 ASSAM TO BE SERVED THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-11 4:DR. JYOTI HAZARIKA MD (MICROBIOLOGY ) LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH QTR NO-E5/TYPE VI LGBRIMH CAMPUS TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR PIN-784001 ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. R MAZUMDAR Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date :24/02/2025 Mr. A. K. Dutta, learned CGC, appearing for the applicants submit that due to oversight, the relevant order of the Court, could not be annexed to the IA. He, therefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the IA with liberty to file afresh. Prayer allowed. IA stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for....... JUDGE Comparing Assistant