1 / 2 1.wp875.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 1739 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 875 OF 2025 Nilesh S/o Sharadrao Borse Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai and anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. H.V. Thakur, Advocate a/w Mr. P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Ashwini S. Athalye, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR AND SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, JJ. DATE : 19.11.2025 Heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned counsel for respondents. 2. The present application is filed for speaking to the minutes in the order dated 07.07.2025. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that there is typographical error in line No.2 of para No. 2 that instead of ‘petitioner’ it should be ‘applicant’. Further in line No.3 of para 2 instead of ‘petitioner’ it should be ‘respondent’ and in the same line instead of ‘unsuitable’, it should be ‘eligible’. Prity 2 / 2 1.wp875.2025 3. The learned counsel appearing for respondents has no objection so far as this part is concerned. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 4. The office is directed to replace in line No.2 of para 2 instead of ‘petitioner’ it should be replaced by ‘applicant’ and in the third line of second para instead of ‘petitioner’ the same should be replaced by ‘respondent’ and in the same line instead of ‘unsuitable’ it should be replaced by ‘eligible’. The motion is accordingly allowed. Hence, the application is disposed of. 5. Necessary corrections be made, and corrected order be uploaded accordingly. (Siddheshwar S. Thombre, J.) (M.M. Nerlikar, J.) Prity