Rajinder Kumar vs. Ravinder Kumarson and another Cr. MP(M) No. 167 of 2025 23.01.2025 Present: Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Awasthi, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Notice. Mr. Naveen Awasthi, Advocate and Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively. The non-applicants do not want to file any reply. They have no objections, if in case, the delay in filing present revision petition is condoned. For the reasons stated in the application, it is evident that there exists sufficient cause, bona fide reasons for condoning the delay in the case at hand, in the interest of justice, the delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No. 67 of 2025 Be registered. Vide separate order of even date, the petition stands disposed of. (Bipin C. Negi) Vacation Judge January 23, 2025 Tarun