Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010015072025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/586/2025 OSIM UDDIN AHMED AND 2 ORS. S/O- LATE ENTAZ ALI, RESIDENT OF VILL- TIYAPARA, P.O.- JOYPUR BAZAR, P.S.- GOALPARA RPS, DIST.- GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783129. 2: ALIMUDDIN SHEIKH S/O- ISMAIL SHEIKH RESIDENT OF VILL.- TIYAPARA P.O.- JOYPUR BAZAR P.S.- GOALPARA RPS DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783129. 3: AFAZ UDDIN AHMED S/O- MOYEJ UDDIN SHEIKH RESIDENT OF VILL- TIYAPARA P.O.- JOYPUR BAZAR P.S.- GOALPARA RPS DIST. -GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783129 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, DISPUR, GHY-06. Page No.# 2/3 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DOWN TOWN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 06. 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37. 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER GOALPARA P.O. P.S. AND DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101. 5:THE BLOCK DEV. OFFICER KHARMUZA DEV. BLOCK P.O.- KHARMUZA P.S. AND DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101. 6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GOALPARA ZILLA PARISHAD P.S. AND DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R SIKDAR, MR N AHMED,MR. A KALAM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, ASEC,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 15.10.2025 Heard Shri JA Sikdar, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri AR Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Page No.# 3/3 Though notice was issued in this case on 03.03.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that due to subsequent developments, the matter has become infructuous. Also heard Shri AK Ghosh, learned counsel on behalf of Shri K Konwar, learned Addl. AG, Assam and Ms. NB Kayastha, learned counsel on behalf of Shri R Dubey, learned Standing Counsel, State Election Commission. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant