Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63830 (PNJ)

SAT PAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/20744/2016 · 2025-07-21

Rohit Kapoor

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-20744-2016 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 CWP-20744-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.07.2025 Sat Pal ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. D.S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sachin Gupta Ladwa, Advocate, Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Yashvir Singh, Advocate and Ms. Nirmala Jangra, Advocate for respondent No. 4. **** ROHIT KAPOOR , J. (oral) 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and respondent No.4 are ad idem that the issue involved in the instant petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench rendered in a bunch of writ petitions, including CWP-20639-2016, titled Gobind Ram and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 03.05.2023. 2. In view thereof, the instant petition is allowed in terms of the aforementioned judgment and the impugned orders of termination SATYAWANAnnexures P-6, P-9 and P-10 are hereby set aside. 2025.07.23 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20744-2016 (O&M) 2 3. The writ petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 21.07.2025 (ROHIT KAPOOR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No SATYAWAN 2025.07.23 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document