Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63826 (ALL)

PREM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/7645/2025 · 2025-07-09

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109423 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7645 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prem Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the Respondents to provide the benefit of old pension scheme to the petitioner while treating the joining of the petitioner as a Class IV employee upon compassionate ground earlier to 1.4.2005. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the Respondent No.4 to consider and take action upon the recommendation of the principal of Respondent No. 6 college dated 29.7.2024. (iii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the Respondent to decide and to take action upon the representation of the petitioner dated 18.3.2025 which is still pending." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.4 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri Sharad Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 to 4, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is hereby directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.4 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.4, District Inspector of Schools, Etawah/Auraiya is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad