1 2025:CGHC:27286 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 825 of 2021 1 - Saroj Manikpuri W/o Shri Jivan Das Aged About 38 Years R/o Village /post Belgahana, Ward No. 14, Gram Panchayat Belgahana, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Returning Officer Tahsil Kota (Panchayat And Election) Shri Pramod Gupta, Tahsildar Kota, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Pithasin Adhikari (Prescribed Officer) Shri Banavali Prasad Vasudev, Lecturer, (L.B.), Jila Shiksha Avaim Prashikshan Sansthan Pendra, Tahsil Pendra, District Gaurela Pendra Maravahi Chhattisgarh 5 - The Matadan Adhikari -1, Shri Bechuram Kol, Teacher, (L.B.), Govt. Middle School, Pandaripani, Gaurela, Tahsil Gaurela, District Gaurela Pendra Maravahi Chhattisgarh 6 - The Matadan Adhikari-2, Shri Tribhuvan Das Goel, Assistant Kol, Teacher, Govt. Primari School, Pandaria, Pendra, Tahsil Pendra, District Pendra Gaurela Maravahi Chhattisgarh 7 - The Matadan Adhikari -3, Shri Rajendra Singh Porte, Assistant Kol, Teacher (L.B.), Primari School, Junavanipara, Kotami Pendra, Tahsil Pendra, District Gaurela Pendra Maravahi Chhattisgarh 8 - Smt. Madhu Yadav W/o Jay Prakash Yadav Aged About 48 Years R/o Village /post Belgahana, Ward No. 17, Gram Panchayat Belgahana, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- 9 - Smt. Purinima Ghosh W/o Uttam Gosh Aged About 50 Years R/o Village /post Belgahana, Ward No. 17, Gram Panchayat Belgahana, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Dashrath Prajapati, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24.06.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi