Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6382 (AP)

Mallimadugu Fishermen Cooperative Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/3526/2020 · 2025-08-12

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010059472020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3526/2020 Between: 1. MALLIMADUGU FISHERMEN COOPERATIVE SOCIETY,, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI NAGIRI MUNEIAH, S/O NAGAYYA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, D.NO.1-72, DODLAMITTA, KARKAMBADI, RENUGUNTA MANDAL, CHITOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITOOR, CHITOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RENUGUNTA POLICE STATION, RENUGUNTA, CHITOOR DISTRICT. 7. THE FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, TIRUPATI. 8. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, TIRUPATI,CHITOOR DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents respondents in not taking any action inspite of representations made by the petitioner society and particularly 6th respondent in not registering any crime in pursuance of representations dated 21-12-2019 and 27-1-2020 made to him as illegal, highhanded, unconstitutional, deliberate, unwarranted, unsustainable, arbitrary against Law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 6th Respondent to register FIR based on the complaint and representations made by the petitioner society and take action against the local people mentioned in the complaint who are illegally restraining the members of the petitioner society from catching fish from the two tanks namely Karakambadi and Venkatapuram tanks which have been leased out to the petitioner society by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, at the earliest in view of the urgency stated above IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents more particularly 6th respondent to register FIR against the local people mentioned in the complaint dated 21-12-2019 and to take necessary action as per law in view pursuant to the complaint submitted to him by the petitioner society at the earliest IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to implead as party respondent Nos. 9 to 13 in the above WP.No. 3526 of 2020 and all interlocutory applications and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P VIVEK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents respondents in not taking any action inspite of representations made by the petitioner society and particularly 6th respondent in not registering any crime in pursuance of representations dated 21-12-2019 and 27-1-2020 made to him as illegal, highhanded, unconstitutional, deliberate, unwarranted, unsustainable, arbitrary against Law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 6th Respondent to register FIR based on the complaint and representations made by the petitioner society and take action against the local people mentioned in the complaint who are illegally restraining the members of the petitioner society from catching fish from the two tanks namely Karakambadi and Venkatapuram tanks which have been leased out to the petitioner society by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, at the earliest in view of the urgency stated above...…” 2. Heard Sri P.Vivek, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.08.2025 MH 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 175 W.P.No.3526 of 2020 Dated.13.08.2025 MH