Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138648 Court No. - 73 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5713 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajkumar Verma Alias Raju Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Shanker,Ray Sahab Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. 1. Heard Shri Rama Shankar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The petitioner has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, with the following relief: (i) To stay the effect and operation of the order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.11, Saharanpur in Criminal Revision No. 384 of 2024 (Rajkumar Verma alias Raju Versus State of U.P. and Another) as well as the order dated 25.11.2022 passed by the learned court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur in Complaint Case No. 17967 of 2017 (Bilal Khan Versus Rajkumar alias Raju and Others) u/s 452, 384, 504, 506 of I.P.C. 3. After due deliberation at length, learned counsel for the petitioner has chosen not to press the instant writ petition on merits. However, he has urged for interim protection to the present petitioner so that he may appear before the court below and participate in the court proceedings. It is submitted that petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the court below to cooperate in the trial. He has never intended to ignore the court proceedings. As such, some protection may be granted. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case protection is granted to the petitioner to enable him to appear before the court below to participate in the court proceedings. 5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction that in case present petitioner appears/surrenders and move bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today, same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. 6. 6. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present petitioner in aforesaid criminal case. 7. As per observation made above, instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Sumit K. Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad