2025:HHC:25941 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 37 of 2018 Decided on : 04.08.2025 Smt. Radha Devi and others. …Petitioners Versus Shri Ram Singh. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that now in terms of the order passed by the learned Executing Court, maintenance has been paid to the petitioner till the month of July, 2025. 2. In the backdrop of this development, as the petition has been rendered infructuous, the same is closed, with the observation that in case, the respondent-husband does not 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:25941 continue to do the needful, in terms of the order passed by the learned Court below and also the directions that were passed from time to time by this Court in these proceedings, the petitioner will be at liberty to file an application for revival. Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Notice discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 04, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)